Firm/Employee Matching: An Industry Study of American Lawyers
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the sources of match-specific value at large American law firms by analyzing how graduates of law schools group into law firms. We measure the degree to which lawyers from certain schools concentrate within firms and then analyze how this agglomeration can be explained by “natural advantage” factors (such as geographic proximity) and by productive spillovers across graduates of a given school. We show that large law firms tend to be concentrated with regard to the law schools they hire from and that individual offices within these firms are substantially more concentrated. The degree of concentration is highly variable, as there is substantial variation in firms’ hiring strategies. There are two main drivers of variation in law school concentration within law offices. First, geography drives a large amount of concentration, as most firms hire largely from local schools. Second, we show that school-based networks (and possibly productive spillovers) are important because partners’ law schools drive associates’ law school composition even controlling for firm, school, and firm/school match characteristics and when we instrument for partners’ law schools. ∗Oyer: Stanford Graduate School of Business and NBER, [email protected]. Schaefer: David Eccles School of Business and Institute for Public and International Affairs, University of Utah, [email protected]. We thank David Autor, Scott Baker, Barry Guryan, Daniel Hamermesh, William Henderson, Matt Jackson, Geoffrey Miller, Alan Sorensen, and Betsey Stevenson for comments and discussions. We also thank participants at numerous seminars and conferences. We are grateful to Marko Tervio for sharing his economist data and to Marco Beltran, Eric Forester, Christopher Jung, Nam Kim, Davis Kingsley, Diane Lee, David Oyer, Jack Rudolph, William Vijverberg, and Kenneth Wong for research assistance. Prior versions of this paper were circulated under the title “The Personnel-Economic Geography of US Law Firms and Law Schools.”
منابع مشابه
Firm Specific Human Capital vs. Job Matching: A New Test
We use a unique data set on employee turnover by industry in Arizona to test competing theories of turnover. We find that industries with lower establishment survival rates have more employee turnover, even after controlling for differences in the distribution of employee tenure. This result is consistent with a model of turnover where employees choose how much firm specific human capital to ac...
متن کاملThe Effect of Firm-Level Contracts on the Structure of Wages: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data
The Effect of Firm-Level Contracts on the Structure of Wages: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data In Spain, as in several other European countries, sectoral bargaining agreements are automatically extended to cover all firms in an industry. Employers and employees can also negotiate firm-specific contracts. We use a large matched employer-employee data set to study the effects of firm-...
متن کاملThe Employee Clientele of Corporate Leverage: Evidence from Personal Labor Income Diversification
Using employee job-level data, we empirically test the equilibrium matching between a firm’s debt usage and its employee job risk aversion (“clientele effect”), as predicted by the existing theories. We measure job risk aversion for a firm’s employees using their labor income concentration in the firm, calculated as the fraction of the employees’ total personal labor income or total household l...
متن کاملWhy Information Technology Workers Own Their Firms: How the Relative Importance of Human Capital Affects Firm Ownership
Knowledge workers are critical for the production of goods and services in the information economy, and thus investment in human capital plays an increasingly important role in economic growth. Since firms cannot directly own human capital and cannot easily monitor or verify human capital investments made by their employees, they need to devise appropriate incentives to attract skilled employee...
متن کاملJob mobility in Portugal: a Bayesian study with matched worker-firm data
We study job mobility using a multivariate hazard model in discrete time. It involves two correlated random effects, one at the firm level and another at the worker level. Bayesian estimates are based on a Portuguese matched employer-employee dataset. Our results confirm the importance of unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level and at the firm level. Furthermore, the model performs bet...
متن کامل